Wolfgang Spohn
(2020). Defeasible normative reasoning. Synthese 197 (4), pp. 1391-1428.
(2018). Epistemic justification: its subjective and its objective ways. Synthese 195 (9), pp. 3837-3856.
(2016)., A survey of ranking theory, in H. Arló-Costa, V. F. Hendricks & J. Van Benthem (eds.), Readings in formal epistemology, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 303-347.
(2014)., How essentialism properly understood might reconcile realism and social constructivism, in D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber & M. C. Galavotti (eds.), New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 255-265.
(2012). Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box. Synthese 187 (1), pp. 95-122.
(2011)., Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences, in D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber & W. J. González (eds.), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 241-251.
(2010)., Multiple contraction revisited, in M. Surez, M. Dorato & M. Rédei (eds.), Epsa epistemology and methodology of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 279-288.
(2004)., Laws are persistent inductive schemes, in F. Stadler (ed.), Induction and deduction in the sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 135-150.
(2003)., Carnap versus Quine, or aprioristic versus naturalized epistemology, or a lesson from dispositions, in T. Bonk (ed.), Language, truth and knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 167-177.
(2002). A brief comparison of Pollock's defeasible reasoning and ranking functions. Synthese 131 (1), pp. 39-56.
(1991)., A reason for explanation: explanations provide stable reasons, in W. Spohn, B. Skyrms & B. C. Van Fraassen (eds.), Existence and explanation, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 165-196.
(ed) (1991). Erkenntnis orientated: a centennial volume for Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach, Springer, Dordrecht.
with Skyrms, B. , van Fraassen, B.C. (eds) (1991). Existence and explanation: essays presented in honor of Karel Lambert, Springer, Dordrecht.