Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(1993) Synthese 95 (2).
Searle has recently used two adaptations of his Chinese room argument in an attack on connectionism. I show that these new forms of the argument are fallacious. First I give an exposition of and rebuttal to the original Chinese room argument, and then a brief introduction to the essentials of connectionism.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/BF01064587
Full citation:
Copeland, B. J. (1993). The curious case of the Chinese gym. Synthese 95 (2), pp. 173-186.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.