Repository | Book | Chapter
(2002) Merleau-Ponty's reading of Husserl, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
The phenomenological movement
A tradition without method? Merleau-Ponty and Husserl
Thomas M. Seebohm
pp. 51-68
Section I tries to analyze the ambivalence of Merleau-Ponty ‘s references to Husserl. On the one hand, they indicate a deconstruction of Husserl ‘s phenomenological method; on the other hand, there are attempts to “save” Husserl. Section II is a critical evaluation ofMerleau-Ponty ‘s account of the development ofHusserl ‘s phenomenology. Section III deals with his rejection of the reduction, the account of eidetic intuition, and intentionality. Section IV is an attempt to characterize the motives behind Merleau-Ponty ‘s disinterest in method.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9944-3_3
Full citation:
Seebohm, T.M. (2002). The phenomenological movement: A tradition without method? Merleau-Ponty and Husserl, in Merleau-Ponty's reading of Husserl, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 51-68.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.