238025

(1994) Synthese 98 (2).

Putting inference to the best explanation in its place

Timothy Day, Harold Kincaid

pp. 271-295

This paper discusses the nature and the status of inference to the best explanation (IBE). We (1) outline the foundational role given IBE by its defenders and the arguments of critics who deny it any place at all; (2) argue that, on the two main conceptions of explanation, IBE cannot be a foundational inference rule; (3) sketch an account of IBE that makes it contextual and dependent on substantive empirical assumptions, much as simplicity seems to be; (4) show how that account avoids the critics' complaints and leaves IBE an important role; and (5) sketch how our account can clarify debates over IBE in arguments for scientific realism.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/BF01063944

Full citation:

Day, T. , Kincaid, H. (1994). Putting inference to the best explanation in its place. Synthese 98 (2), pp. 271-295.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.