Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles

(2005) Synthese 144 (3).
Attempts to capture the distinction between categorical and dispositional states in terms of more primitive modal notions – subjunctive conditionals, causal roles, or combinatorial principles – are bound to fail. Such failure is ensured by a deep symmetry in the ways dispositional and categorical states alike carry modal import. But the categorical/dispositional distinction should not be abandoned; it underpins important metaphysical disputes. Rather, it should be taken as a primitive, after which the doomed attempts at reductive explanation can be transformed into circular but interesting accounts.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-005-5857-2
Full citation:
Cross, T. (2005). What is a disposition?. Synthese 144 (3), pp. 321-341.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.