Repository | Book | Chapter
(1979) The structure and development of science, Dordrecht, Springer.
A series of theories T 1, T 2, T 3,… constituting a scientific research program, is "theoretically" and "empirically progressive" and therefore to be appraised as truly 'scientific" and "rational", and to be preferred methodologically, if "each subsequent theory… [has] at least as much content as the unrefuted content of its predecessor" and "leads us to the discovery of some new fact" 1 Such is Imre Lakatos's linear theory of scientific growth. My contention is that a partial ordering of a kind represented in Figure 1 and generalized to n dimensions serves better both the purpose of explicating the historical case studies adduced by Lakatos in support of his view and the purpose of arriving at a normative structure for the appraisal of progress in scientific research. I shall conclude then that it is necessary to add to Lakatos's methodological principles an additional one: the principle of lattice-growth.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9459-1_8
Full citation:
Heelan, P.A. (1979)., The lattice of growth in knowledge, in G. Radnitzky & G. Andersson (eds.), The structure and development of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 205-211.