Repository | Book | Chapter
(1988) Science in reflection, Dordrecht, Springer.
Of the three points made by L.J. Cohen, I shall consider two: his refutation of irrealism and his argument that van Fraassen's version of irrealism is subject to the same difficulties van Fraassen has found with realism.
Publication details
Full citation:
Zemach, E. M. (1988)., Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism, in E. Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), Science in reflection, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 97-101.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.