Alain Badiou has developed perhaps the most sophisticated formalization of the event today. Events are necessarily historical, whereas nature, he argues, does not have history and thus does not have events. Nature’s smooth indifference precludes it from falling within history’s scope. And so what is the texture of history? Not in an abstract, metaphoric sense, but precisely in a formalized manner, how can we express the logical spatiality of history? Indeed, building on Husserl’s closure and openness in history, the event takes place both on the edge of the open void and the closure of a pure point. My spatial incursion here is to argue that history is necessarily the spatialized relation between key evental points. This prompts us to rethink relationality – is it a waiting? An avenir of the subject, in Derridean terms? A pure emptiness? I argue that this historic spatialization is nowhere static – it is constantly remade in light of new events. In terms of phenomenology, this likewise requires us to rethink history from the standpoint of a subject who is fundamentally remade every time she is caught in a new event. Thus, I offer us a new mode of thinking history and phenomenology – through a dialectics of logical spatiality.